Perhaps you should find a better example than knock-em up Jessie to lead the charge. Jackson is good at stirring up crap because he needs racisim to extort money from American companies. If he can not go out and claim blacks were disenfranchised he would not be able to extort money.

I wonder why we are not addressing all the problems that republican voters faced? There were a number of problems in PA and IL. PA had voting machines with votes already on them for Kerry when the polls opened. Why isn't revvum Jackson intersted in the whiter folks who were denied the right to vote in Chicago because they were republicans and were mysteriously not on the voting lists.

We do need voter reform because there are problems on BOTH SIDES. Maybe we can now make it law that you prove citizenship when you register and then you show a photo ID when you vote. Perhaps we can also have some serious jail time for anyone who commits a crime. I am not talking about the donk tactic of alleging crimes even if they do not exist (yes, they put it out in writing at the DNC web site). When you do that you sort of lose credibility when you make a claim. Afterall, how does the Big Dog know whether you are lying or not?

If you want voter reform stop the partisan belly aching and aknowledge that problems happen on both sides and work to fix the whole process. Presenting a distorted one sided story does not help your cause.

BTW, why don't you mention the law breaking going on with the donks in Washington. The judges out there are changing the law so the donk candidate can win. This is fraud as much as anything else. Oh, I forgot. It is only fraud and election stealing when a republican wins. My bad.

Why do you hate Jackson so much? I saw your venomous entry about Jackson on your site. Why is it that anybody fighting for civil rights in the Black community is “playing the race card” or “extorting” something? Sure, it doesn’t get as obnoxious as Al Sharpton, but come on. Oh, I forgot. Slavery ended 139 years ago. Get with the picture “Revuum”. Stop “knocking up” those women and start being more religious like. Big Dog, my friend, leave Jackson out of this one.

I liked what you wrote over at your site after that though. Your line, "The strange thing is that they do not list any problems encountered by the republican voters." was strange to me though. I'm sure I can find at least one partisan complaint if I look hard, but most of the issues over there on their lists are things like more votes than registered voters, a machine malfunction, etc. I don't think you have a valid argument here for calling them partisan. Sure, the organization is probably liberals. It's an honest statement that the only people complaining are the people who lost. That list is pretty non-partisan in my opinion though.

You're always telling me what to write about. You gotta know this is my site. I don't go over there and tell you what to write. Right now I'm involved in letters and contacts dealing with the Ohio election problems. I try to keep my eye on the other events, but right now these seem the most pressing to me. Plus I just don't fully understand what is going on there in D.C. If you want to explain to me the situation then I might take an interest.

Yes, I am against the Republicans. I don’t think they are incompetent by no means. I just know in my heart they do not have the American people’s best interest in mind. I don't want taxes cut. I was the tax codes reformed. I don't want Social Security put into the hands of private investors. I want the system updated. I want medical care for all and better job creation. These are the two bigest crisises we have. This high tech job crap to make up for outsourcing is a total joke. This is a whole other conversation though.

My letter to the Reps is very partisan yes, but I admit there are some non-partisan problems that have not been addressed. It is only fraud and election stealing if a "Donk" contests the results of an election, right? A Republican always wins fair and square and then the "Donks" have to recount their way into the seat. Give me a break. There is a growing list of machine malfunctions and apparent fraud. We have to do something about that. It’s not partisan belly aching when the evidence starts stacking up that not every vote counted legitimately. Compose me a letter if you like. Make it tell my Reps that the election was fishy, but it wasn’t a partisan thing. Something still needs to be done.

Rev Jackson is no more interested in civil rights than the man in the moon. Jackson absolutely extorts money from companies by telling them he will say they are racists if they do not pay up. He does not pay any taxes and avoids the system. He is a very rich man telling everyone how bad the blacks have it. The blacks are no where as bad off as Jackson says they are. He is not a religious man so he should stop using the reverend moniker. If Jackson wants blacks to be responsible then he should set an example better than he has. The inner city is rife with people who know how to get girls pregnant etc.

It is Washington State, not DC and if you do not know what is going on there then me telling you won't help.

I don't give a rodent's behind what you write at this site or anywhere else. I am pointing out that you are not presenting a fair and balanced view. As for taxes and SS and the other stuff, you are entitled to your opinion but I don't feel it is up to the taxpayer to support everything in this country. The donks are always screaming about the Constitution (and the myth about separation of Church and State) so show me where it says in our founding documents where it is the individual's responsibility to fund all these things. Show me where they are allowed to take my money. Our government is no better than the tyrants we left in England to get here. Soon they will be knocking on our doors to collect the taxes....

BTW, I know you don't like it when I bring up Clinton but he was the last elected donk, so answer this. Fraud is not a new thing. It has been around for many years. If your claims are correct, why is it that we did not have recounts and crying when Clinton was elected? The republicans did none of these things and some of the margins were just as close as they are today....

Just a question to get you thinking, but don't hurt yourself. I know how you get when I mention Bubba...

Well, I'll tell you the same thing about Clinton that I've told everyone who brings up a similar question. I was ten when he was elected, fourteen when he was re-elected. I don't know what you were doing when you were ten and fourteen but I assume it was not complaining about politics. I have no perspective on those events.

Alright, I thought when they said Washington they meant D.C. I know there was a recount, and I think a second one, and finally the Democrat won and the Democrats called it over. It sounds rediculus, I know. I'm not following it though and I can not say much about it. I asked you to explain but you bowed out so I guess that's that. I slip up sometimes, but mostly I try not to write about things I lack complete understanding in.

Fair and balanced is for Fox News (insert snort). I write things how I see them here and I won't even pretend to be fair or balanced. I can't stand the way Republicans do their jobs. I get frustrated at the "donks" and how they handle things these days but I'd vote a "donk" in years before I'd vote for the Republicans you guys front. I hate George W. Bush and I hate his wars. I hate his staff and their arrogance. It's a long list in fact...

I love your name calling though. "Bubba", "donk", "knock-em-up", etc. I do call Bush a baboon now and again though so I guesS I'll forgive you. I could just start calling him "shrub" and get it over with.

Ask me where in the "founding documents" it tells us to live by those documents like they are the Holy Bible. It's been over two hundred years since most of this stuff was created. Our government is dynamic and always changing. Sure, go back to those days if you want, but these days Americans are smart enough to know that giving is a good thing to do. Reform the system so that it doesn't take so much away from the poor but don't cut taxes across the board to help your elitist buddies. God, man. What is wrong with giving a little to help people? You guys are always telling me, "We earned that money. The government is wrong to take it." It just makes no sense to me that people would feel like they deserve so much because they worked for it. Americans need these programs that our tax money pays for.

I think you made my case. You do not know what is going on in Washington because it concerns fraud on the other side. You are too busy spending your energy in Ohio. If you were interested in equity in the election process you would be protesting both.
I know you were ten when Clinton was in office. Unfortunately, that is the most recent democrat and we obviously can't go back further or you would not have been born...
When I was between the ages of ten and fourteen I was paying attention to the war in Vietnam and the Watergate fiasco. I also watched a hostage crisis during the Olympics in Munich, but that was just me.
I call a lot of public figures names. Jackson calls people himey, and uncle Tom, donk is short for donkey (they picked it I didn't) and Jackson is a degenerate who got a subordinate pregnant. Just the way it is. As for Bubba, I think that is funnier than their two names together (Hill and Billy). Considering where they are from I could have a field day...And I do not recall calling you any names or getting personal.
Funny you should refer to founding documents by saying follow them like the Bible. The left does not know where to find a Bible (and half the right didn't read it).
The founding documents are not dynamic, living, flexible or anything else. The reason we have survived for so long is that we do not keep changing them. What did we do before there were taxes? I don't mind paying my fair share but 40% is insane. The gvt gets far more money than it needs to operate it just wastes-period.
As far as allowing people to invest their own money in retirement. That sounds a bit more logical than taking 6.5% of their money to pay for someone elses.

"You do not know what is going on in Washington because it concerns fraud on the other side."

Excuse me, Big Dog, for not following one thing as close as I follow something else. If you really want I can go look into this Washington issue and write what I think of it. You've already acused me of not bothering because I somehow know the Democrats are involved in fraud though. Oh I just couldn't stand it if the "donks" were caught doing something wrong. I better just ignore the whole thing. You know, play it safe?

You silly man. The donkey is the Democrat's symbol. Nobody refers to Republicans and Elephants though. Calling them "donks" is just another way to put them down, so don't act like it's not your fault they are donkeys.

What do you mean the left does not know where to find a bible?

I am sorry for offending you. I had just assumed that a college student with so much political ambition would be up on these things. I somehow figured you would be able to multi-task. Sorry if I held you in too high a regard. I would not say you are deliberately ignoring Washington because you need to play it safe. I am suggesting that if this were reversed with allegations of fraud against the republican candidate you would be all over it.

I did not say I did not use the term donks disparingly, only that they picked the symbol. I chose to exploit it, so be it.

I am not a silly man. I am anything but silly. That patronizing tone might work with your latte buddies but it won't work with me.
Perhaps no one refers to the republicans as ellies because it sounds strange. Though I will tell you that some of the names I've heard the other side call us has to do with our mothers being female dogs...

I was mistaken. The left can find a Bible (it has a capital B). They usually take the one the Gideons leave in the hotel room, right after they leave their girlfriends and go home to their wives.

Jessie Jackson probably has enough of them to start a Church, if actually practiced as a reverend.

Ouch, Big Dog. You're not pulling punches here against the left. I guess I could expect no less. Sorry to strike a nerve after missing that capital B. Now you ARE being silly. Admit it. That whole bit about the Gideons...

I don't have latte buddies though. I wish I did. Don't act like there isn't that kind of name calling on both sides either. Using the term "donk" just makes you sound kind of dumb I think, so I'd advise against it. Sorry to attempt to patronize you.